My reviewers agreed that my plans to expand the history were good and that my sources are both reliable and much-needed by the page. One reviewer also mentioned that planning out the history of the group and perhaps providing more details about its ideology would strengthen the page, which I agree with. I also know that this reviewer identified the heavily-conspiratorial nature of parts of the article as problematic, which I also agree with.

I plan to use my sources to create a brief timeline of the group with some good examples sprinkled throughout it. This will add content to the main section and possibly clear things up better than they currently are. I would also like to flat-out remove the entire conspiracy section, but that may be more difficult.