Latin American Response to Bolivia’s Political Unrest

Following the right-wing coup in Bolivia and the resignation of Evo Morales, the governments and people of several Latin American countries have let their thoughts and opinions be heard. One of the main countries voicing their opinion is Mexico, which granted Morales political asylum following his coerced resignation by the military in an order to return the country to peace. A Mexican Air Force G550 was sent Monday morning to pick up Morales in a proactive effort, not a reactive effort. There was uneasiness in the journey because the plane took off from Lima, Peru it was not allowed to land in Bolivia and had to return and wait for hours. After Morales was picked up, the plane was not able to refuel in Peru “due to political evaluations.” The plane was then able to land in Paraguay after a discussion between Argentina’s President-elect Alberto Fernandez and Paraguay’s President Mario Abdo. Following his departure, Morales tweeted “Sisters and brothers, I am leaving towards Mexico… It hurts to leave the country for political reasons; however, I will always be watching. Soon I will return with more strength and energy.”

Many left-leaning Latin American governments have expressed their thoughts that this was coup, while right-leaning governments like the US and the UK have expressed this as a return to democracy. Nicaragua’s left-leaning president Daniel Ortega has called this a coup and shows his unwavering support for Morales. Argentina’s foreign minister agrees with the recommendation from the OAS about holding new elections, but its President-elect Alberto Fernandez describes what has been happening a coup, saying “It was a coup perpetrated against the president who had called for a new electoral process”. There have even been huge protests in Buenos Aires against the coup. Venezuela’s Maduro condemned this suspected coup and added his support for the Native Bolivian people who he calls “victims of racism,” while Juan Guaido describes this as a continuation of the “democratic hurricane in Latin America”. Cuba has also called this a coup. Countries with more center and/or right-leaning governments have not called this a coup, but do call for a peaceful transition and process, these countries include Chile, Peru, Colombia, and Brazil.

Latin America as a whole is portrayed differently in all the articles I looked at. It depends on which news site, but these sites seem more or less neutral and just reporting on an event that could be considered a coup or not, which also depends on which government leader people are asking. This is very important to our class discussion because Latin America has a lengthy history of right-wing coups that have taken out democratically elected governments. We are seeing history in the making, and a history that has clearly repeated itself.

Sources

  1. https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Bolivias-Evo-Morales-Lands-In-Mexico-As-A-Political-Refugee-20191112-0005.html
  2. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/mexico-grants-asylum-bolivia-evo-morales-191111232118741.html
  3. https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/13/americas/bolivia-political-unrest-intl-hnk/index.html
  4. https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/massive-mobilization-in-buenos-aires-against-coup-in-bolivia-20191112-0021.html

Class Notes 11/13/2019

After announcements, Elle Dykstra presented on their Latin America in the News which concerned Evo Morales stepping down from the presidency in Bolivia. We spent most of the class discussing different perspectives/opinions about how Bolivia’s elections had resulted in voter fraud. It’s debatable whether or not Morales’ election/protest would be considered a coup. Jeanine Anez, the acting president of Bolivia, is currently in the process of making a new election.

  • We continued to discuss about coups and what makes a coup?
    • Military Intervention
    • Outside of the Legal/constit process.

Great Discussions on the LA in the news topic!!

Moved on briefly on the “Maps” we looked at for our HAP. Mapping Militant Groups = how can digital visualizations give a better understanding of these complicated political organizations? (we will talk more about this more in the next class, briefly at the beginning)

We got into our HAP groups and discussed how the “maps” were a bit unclear and confusing, which made us struggle with the research question section of the HAP.

Evo Morales Steps Down as President of Bolivia

Evo Morales announces his resignation on November 10th.

On November 10th, 2019, Bolivia’s three-term president stepped down after weeks of widespread protests and violence due to the results of the October 20th election, in which Morales achieved a surprise victory over his opponent Carlos de Mesa. In Bolivian elections, a candidate requires either 50 percent of the vote, or at least 40 percent with a 10 percentage point lead over the next candidate (CEPR). If a candidate doesn’t reach either of these, the top two candidates are placed into a runoff election against one another. In Bolivia, there are also two vote-counting systems. The first is the “quick count”, a system which gives a count of the votes received on election night for use by the media. The second is the official count, which usually takes longer to count, includes all votes, and is the only system that is legally binding (CEPR). The quick count gave Morales a lead over de Mesa, but not the 10 percentage point lead he needed to avoid a runoff election. A few days later, the final election results through the official count were delivered, and Morales won with just over a 10 percentage point lead.

Subsequently, the opposition to Morales denounced him and his results and took to the streets in protest. The opposition cites his decision to run for a fourth term despite his promise that he wouldn’t, his successful removal of term limits through the constitutional court declaring them a human rights violation, his decision to build a luxury presidential palace and a museum dedicated to himself, and the fact that the votes he needed to win coming in at the last minute as justification for their belief that the election was illegitimate (CNN). After weeks of protest and calls to resign, Morales offered to hold a second election. However, the opposition and Bolivian protestors were not placated by this, and with the military joining in against Morales, him and much of his cabinet stepped down in an attempt to “stop the bloodshed” (NYT), and stating that what was occurring was a coup.

Carlos de Mesa speaking to the media.

Morales’s supporters agree that a coup occurred. They cite widespread right-wing violence in the weeks after the election for calling this a coup, with terror tactics such as Carlos de Mesa’s party paying youths to cause chaos as primary examples (teleSUR). Racism is also said to be a motivation behind this alleged coup. Morales is the first indigenous president of Bolivia and is immensely popular with the indigenous people of the country due to his major reforms. Much violence has been specifically targeted towards indigenous women, such as when a mayor of Morales’s party “was beaten, dragged through the dirt and doused with red paint in ritual fashion” (teleSUR). Furthermore, many of the votes which gave Morales his belated lead were from rural areas with a high indigenous population, areas which historically report late and heavily favor Morales.

What I found highly interesting was how the event has been portrayed in United States media outlets versus Telesur, a Latin American news network sponsored by Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Uruguay, and Bolivia. The New York Times portrays Morales as a leader desperately trying to hold on to power, but does make note of his accomplishments of lifting many out of poverty. Both the New York Times and CNN describe the response to Morales as an “rebellion” (NYT) of the people against an oppressive ruler, both portray the delayed votes as the votes being delayed without any known reason, and cite the OAS as evidence that the election results were highly irregular. Telesur takes a diametrically opposed viewpoint. It, unlike the other articles, mentions that Morales’s party asked the OAS to recount the results, and characterizes the opposition as seeking to seize power in any way possible, not caring about the results of the election. Telesur does not mention Morales successfully petitioning to have term limits removed, or any criticisms of his actions as president. It should be noted that the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), a think-tank based in Washington D.C., has examined the results of the election and found nothing out of line in this election when compared to previous elections, calling the OAS’s decision to question the election results without providing any evidence as “very unusual, and highly questionably” (CEPR).

Jeanine Áñez, the current president of Bolivia. She was 5th in the line of succession as Second Vice President of the Senate.

In the context of our class themes, I see these events as indicative of a counterrevolution, most similar to what occurred in Chile in 1973. Morales as president was a popular leftist leader, who was forced out of office by the actions of the military, an event very obviously reminiscent of Allende’s fall (do note that the New York Times clarifies that this is not an “old-school coup in which the military aims to take power itself”). Furthermore, this comes after Bolivia’s cancelling of an agreement with a foreign firm to mine lithium in the country (Common Dreams), much like how the Chilean nationalization of copper in 1971 under Allende prompted the military coup there and then. The OAS is also a major player in these recent events, hearkening back to our class examination of Fidel Castro’s denouncement of the OAS, and adding in themes of imperialism and neocolonialism. Finally, US support of dictatorship can be seen in the portrayal of these events, as the New York Times article ends with a quote from far-right President of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro, an authoritarian leader who has on numerous occasions praised Brazil’s oppressive military dictatorship—quite literally giving him the last word in this matter.

Works Cited:

Beeton, Dan. “No Evidence That Bolivian Election Results Were Affected by Irregularities or Fraud, Statistical Analysis Shows: Press Releases.” CEPR, Center for Economic and Policy Research, 8 Nov. 2019, http://cepr.net/press-center/press-releases/no-evidence-that-bolivian-election-results-were-affected-by-irregularities-or-fraud-statistical-analysis-shows.

Forster, Cindy. “Bolivia in Crosshairs of US Counter-Revolution.” TeleSUR English, TeleSUR, 11 Nov. 2019, https://www.telesurenglish.net/opinion/Bolivia-in-Crosshairs-of-US-Counter-revolution-20191111-0004.html.

Ghitis, Frida. “Bolivia’s Blunt Message to Leaders Drunk on Power.” CNN, Cable News Network, 11 Nov. 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/11/opinions/bolivia-evo-morales-ghitis/index.html.

Higgins, Eoin. “Bolivian Coup Comes Less Than a Week After Morales Stopped Multinational Firm’s Lithium Deal.” Common Dreams, Common Dreams, 11 Nov. 2019, https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/11/11/bolivian-coup-comes-less-week-after-morales-stopped-multinational-firms-lithium-deal.

Londoño, Ernesto. “Bolivian Leader Evo Morales Steps Down.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 10 Nov. 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/10/world/americas/evo-morales-bolivia.html.

Class Notes 11/6/2019

Today’s class began with professor Holt tellingustoday’s announcements. Among today’s announcements there was an announcement about registering for classes, the death of Walter Mercado and an announcement about our upcoming exam. After announcements, We did LA News. The news was about femicide in Latin American countries. It turns out that LAtin America is has most of the states with the highest rates of femicide. After LA news, we worked on wikipedia in our laptops and that concluded class.

L.A. in the News

On November 3rd, the day after Mexico’s famous holiday, “Day of the Dead,” protests erupted across Mexico City. The protest was about the number of murdered and missing women rising across Latin America. Protesters carried over one hundred purple crosses across the country’s capital. Each cross had the name of specific women who have been murdered or gone missing. The protest was titled “Dia de Muertas,” which translates to “Day of the Dead Women.” BBC’s article discussed the reason behind women being murdered as “femicide.” “Femicide, the murder of a woman because of her gender, kills 12 women daily in Latin America according to the UN” (BBC, Violence Against Women: ‘Day of the Dead Women’ Protest in Mexico City). The protesters laid large posters across the city’s ground showcasing over forty specific women’s faces who have been murdered or gone missing. A highlight of the posters was one that said, “Not one more.” The protest was led by the group, “Voices of Absence.” Frida Guerrara, a journalist and activist, led the demonstration.

The main reason behind the protest is for women to have their voices be heard after too many have been killed because of their gender. The protest also attempted to raise awareness and “[demand] justice through the legal system” (BBC). As mentioned before, “femicide” has been a massive issue across Latin America, and the world, and the protest successfully brought people’s attention to this problem. “Latin America is home to 14 of the 25 countries with the highest rates of femicide in the world, and 98% of gender-related killings go unprosecuted” (BBC). In 2018, the United Nations started their campaign to end gender-violence in Latin America. The United Nations’ deputy head, Amina Mohammed, “… praised Mexico, among other Latin American countries, for having the ‘political courage to confront and end femicide” (BBC). A similar protest occurred in Mexico back in 2016. Instead of posters, protesters and activists laid out high heels and pink crosses to remember the women who were murdered.

In BBC’s article, they portray Latin America as a dangerous region to be in. The article mainly discusses how the majority of Latin American countries are extremely high in “femicide” and for violence, in general. The article also portrays Latin America as a region that needs plenty of help. The article discusses the United Nations’ impact in Mexico and other Latin American countries. For example, as discussed before, the UN’s campaign and initiative to eliminate gender-violence in Latin America is still a work in progress, clearly, but will eventually and ultimately help this struggling region of the world.

In relation to our class, the article shows that there is still a lot of chaos in Latin America today. The article shows how women are still being mistreated, even violently, as they were throughout revolutionary history. To summarize, the protest shows that there is still gender disparity, in incredibly unfortunate ways of violence, across Latin America and the world. Moreover, it proves that male dominance still occurs and the stereotype of a superior and inferior gender are very much active.

Article:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-50287993

 

Native American Heritage Month

The Center for Diversity and Inclusion invites you to celebrate Native American Heritage Month with our kickoff event this Thursday, November 7 at 7PM in the Andrews Library Core. Join the Native American Indian Center of Central Ohio in learning about native foods and their origins.

Then sit back and relax on November 20 from 11AM to 1PM in the Lowry Pit and enjoy the sounds of Cherokee singer/songwriter Michael Jacobs.

Painful Hope: An Israeli Settler and a Palestinian Activist in Dialogue Thursday 11/7

The Painful Hope: An Israeli Settler and a Palestinian Activist in Dialogue, which is free and open to the public. This event will be held on Thursday, November 7th, 7:30 p.m., in Lean Lecture Room of Wishart Hall.

Shadi Abu Awwad – was born into a family of proud Palestinian leaders who were at the helm of the first Palestinian intifada (uprising). Imbued with a deep hatred for Israelis as a child, his family underwent a major transformation and were among the pioneers who reached across the divide to their Jewish neighbors to work together to create a shared vision for their future. Shadi now builds a new generation of Palestinians and Israelis who can confront problems between their communities while acknowledging each other’s shared humanity.

Hanan Schlesinger – is an Orthodox rabbi and teacher, and passionate Zionist settler who was profoundly transformed by his friendship and exchanges with local Palestinians.  His understanding and perceptions of the Middle East conflicts, and of Zionism, have been utterly complicated by his introduction to the parallel universe they share.

Please join Shadi and Hanan and hear their personal, interconnected stories and share the groundbreaking and challenging grassroots work of Roots. They bring their deep conviction that understanding, and trust are the prerequisites for lasting justice, freedom, and peace on the tiny sliver of land they both call home.

Sponsored by: Middle Eastern and North African Studies, the Department of History, the Department of Religious Studies, Global and International Studies and the Office of Religious and Spiritual Life.  Made possible by the Kornfeld Fund.

Class Notes 11/4

Class began with the daily announcements:

  • Lecture: Tuesday 11/5 @ 7 Dr. Leiby on “immigrants in Ohio” Science Café, Spoon Market
  • Election Day: Tuesday shuttles from Babcock Hall
  • Global Engagement Fair: Tuesday 10-2 in Lowry
  • Peer review of full Wikipedia articles: Wednesday )bring your computers)

After the announcements, we talked about the midterm. There is one major change to the format of the midterm; instead of prepping four primary sources and choosing out of the three that are on the Midterm we will prepare two primary sources and get presented one instead of choosing on the Midterm. After announcements, Shahroz presented on the murder of an Indigenous man from the Amazon by illegal loggers. Shahroz discusses how since the election of the right-winged Bolsonaro, the Amazon has suffered greatly. There have been big chunks of the Amazon sold off to corporations by the President instead of protecting the rainforest. Because of this, there have been efforts by Indigenous people to become “forest guardians” who take it upon themselves to ward off the illegal loggers. The news article goes into the death of one of these forest guardians. After the presentation, there were questions about the ideology of Bolsonaro and Professor Holt explained that he did not run on a platform of Indigenous rights and believes that the Native people who reside in the Amazon should be integrated and “modernized” into the rest of the country. Professor Holt talked about a NYT video on the environmental issues going on in Brazil.

Before we were put into our HAP groups, we discussed what the historical analysis was for the day with regards to the readings

  • Historical Context: What has happened since the FSLN took power?
  • Historiography: How have historians interpreted the lived experiences of  Nicaraguans under the Sandanista government? After the return to contested elections?
  • Your interpretations: How revolutionary were the changes in Nicaragua?

Professor Holt then showed a powerpoint with an important timeline of events and explained that we must also think about and understand the natural disasters that destabilized the nation. It was also noted how there was a political change with a non-Sandanista president, but right after Daniel Ortega was elected once again. We were then put into our HAP groups to have a small debate about the readings that were assigned. When we came back together we discussed the two different articles and how they compared.

Key Terms

  • Sandanistas- a socialist political party that gained power of Nicaragua in 1979
  • Violeta Chamorro- center-right, US-backed former president of Nicaragua that precede Daniel Ortega
  • Central American Free Trade Agreement- similar to NAFTA, CAFTA  consists of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Dominican Republic

Links

  1. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/26/bolsonaro-amazon-tribes-indigenous-brazil-dictatorship
  2. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/27/world/turnover-in-nicaragua-aristocratic-democrat-violeta-barrios-de-chamorro.html
  3. https://www.citizen.org/article/central-america-free-trade-agreement-cafta/

Questions

  • What were the reasons to elect two non-Sandanista presidents in a row?
  • What were the ramifications of Chamorro being the one and only woman president to date and why does it matter that she was backed by the United States?
  • What were the ramifications of the CAFTA?

Dr. Leiby on Surviving in the Heartland: Immigrant Communities in OH Tuesday 11/5 @7pm

Please join us for this month’s Wooster Science Café next Tuesday,  November 5th from 7-8pm. It will be in the Excelsior Room at Spoon Market & Deli (144 W Liberty St, Wooster). Please come early if you would like to get food and eat before the café and you can bring these upstairs to enjoy during the cafe. There will also be light appetizers provided for free by Spoon. We hope you will come early to mingle.

Michele Leiby,  in Political Science at The College of Wooster, will share the results of a community-based research project on the lives of Central American immigrants in rural Ohio. The discussion will include consideration of the factors driving immigration from Central America to the United States and how U.S. immigration policies impact the lives of immigrants.  It will conclude with consideration of evidence-based strategies for effectively advocating for immigrants’ human rights.